| Who's web site is this? |
| I'm Greg Kane, MD, an internist, medical malpractice consultant, and medical expert witness broker in metro Denver, Colorado. As a med-mal expert broker I get calls from defense attorneys looking
for a doctor to counter SFST evidence, usually a neurologist to discuss
nystagmus. Too often these cases The government's evidence is junk science. Because we doctors are trained in the mathematics of the interpretation of imprecise physical tests, I happen to know how science says SFST results are correctly interpreted—and it ain't how the NHTSA and the DUI bar do it. On account of which: FieldSobrietyTest.info. |
|
|||||||||||||||
Science proves that if juries depend on SFSTs to decide
their verdicts, most DUI convictions will Look, I'd just as soon the government quit convicting people with junk science evidence. But until they do I'm available to help defendants who are victims of these phony tests. DUI attorneys have used my affidavit to
I can't help you with cases with a valid chemical test showing a high BAC. |
||||||||||||||||
involve
drivers who failed an SFST, had a BAC of zero,
and are now charged with driving while intoxicated by, say, a therapeutic
level of some benign medicine prescribed by their own doctor. The
government's reasoning: they failed an SFST, they must have been impaired.
Exclude
junk science SFST evidence from trial 
I also have a page about HGN If you're a med-mal attorney, visit me at medmalEXPERTS.com |
|
